Soil Salinity Hypotheses
Soil Salinity: How did farming cause it?
Hypotheses: Dead Roots? Road? Ditch? Toxin? Cation?
By: Grant Rigby Apr 27, 2021 / Sep 30, 2020 / Feb 6, 2018 / Feb 22, 2016
Salinity can yield famine and starve civilization.
History: Our 1882 family homestead farm had no barren or white salt areas for over a century of grain farming until a few small patches of white surface salts appeared for the first time in 2000, nor had it for 10,000 years of variable Prairie climate following the pure water flushing of the ice age melt. After three decades of aggressive inputs, crops on the rich deep black soils around our sloughs, where crops had always been the tallest, were now stunted and worse than upslope, and an AgCanada soil specialist diagnosed both compaction and salinity as culpable.
Experience: With the objective of halting soil salinization, all herbicides and fertilizers, repetitive traffic compaction, and most fall tillage, were halted on our homestead farm in 2001. Clover, alfalfa and tall wheatgrass were sown in saline spots, and all wild perennial plants were allowed to live where domesticated species could not establish. Alfalfa timothy hay cropping in the fields, and now back to grains with sparse surviving alfalfa tolerated as well as adapted wild plants, but no barren fallow of course. No barren salt patches remain, foxtail has declined from swards to sparse, and crop stands are improving in fertile low areas where before 2001 they were declining. Research is necessary to conclude why, but we can surmise plausible truths.
The Scientists: Soil scientists, a full bus load tour, came to our old alfalfa-timothy hay field in SW Manitoba in August 2012. They investigated a 4 ft deep x 100 ft trench, dug from a tiny low patch where only the weed foxtail-barley could grow, up the adjacent eroded knoll, to view the salinity in the glacial till clay-loam chernozem soil.
The scientists analyzed the white specs present in the dry black top soil under that low foxtail-barley patch, to be the dry form of calcium-sulfate salt. Some wondered if the common practice of sulfate fertilization, in our nitrogen-phosphorus-sulfur blends for two decades until 2001, might have resulted in now common prevalent calcium-sulfate salinity.
The subsoil under that foxtail-barley patch was still wet, despite 12 months of drought and no water pond nearby. Its electro-conductivity, measuring total dissolved ions, was too high for any plant root to pull water away from the stronger osmotic hold of the dissolved calcium-sulfate brine. Adjacent quackgrass had failed to grow into the brine to displace the better adapted shallow-rooted foxtail-barley thriving above the brine.
Below this calcium-sulfate brine, at 3ft depth, was a vein of sand in the otherwise yellow clay soil of the trench. They surmised that sulfur and perhaps calcium had flowed with water to that point under the foxtail-barley patch, via the sand vein, from some higher origin under the knoll. When winds evaporated pure water from the hard barren field surface, in wheel tracks and in spring before protection via loose tillage or living canopy, the calcium-sulfate solution wicked to the surface via capillarity, and concentrated there in white salts as water evaporated.
The Questions: So what did we farmers do that caused sulfate and calcium to leave their origins in the subsoil of the knolls, to concentrate as their salt form in saline seeps? Why has salinity accelerated in recent decades?
Sod-breaking Hypothesis: Severing the deep living roots via ploughing, and thus ending the 10,000 year supply of photosynthesis energy to the deep living subsoil of the original perennial prairie, resulted in death of the deep subsoil ecology of plant roots, mycorhizae, bacteria, soil animals, etc, and release of its ancient biological sulfur as leachable sulfate. Biennial clover in the crop rotation, which had recaptured some sulfate, ended half a century ago, leaving just shallow-rooting annual crops that die at ripening. Only deep rooted wild rose endured tillage on knolls until modern glyphosate also killed it, releasing more ancient sulfate from the now half century continuously dead-fallowed subsoil.
If this hypothesis is valid, then imagine new agronomy to maintain some living deep roots to recycle biological sulfur within living soil organisms instead of leaching as sulfate, for example:
- Add clovers or winter rye at spring crop seeding, for deep living roots in fall to next spring.
- Maintain sparse alfalfa and wild rose plants within annual grain crop rotations, in precision strips, or via only shallow disking or selective herbicide, so deep alfalfa and rose endure within annual crops.
- Breed new biennial crops to replace annual crops, for example an edible sweet clover, sown and over-sown every spring for harvest 15 months later, to ensure living roots are always present in the subsoil.
Or, Soil Erosion Hypothesis: Tillage, water, and wind erosion redistributed the nutrient dense top soil within fields, yet the solar radiation remained uniformly distributed. Soil development, over 10,000 years, had left sulfur held within living organisms at the maximum concentration per unit of surface area that solar energy could sustain alive via photosynthesis. Carried by erosion, sulfur becomes surplus in low areas receiving eroded topsoil, due to limited solar radiation not sustaining an increase in total soil life to retain more sulfur within biology, so sulfate leaches.
If valid, then soil landscape restoration, removing soil accumulated at the base of slopes and applying it on the severely eroded hilltops, would not only restore soil health there (Lobb, 2015), but might also reduce salinity in the low areas by removing excess nutrients. Shredding woody brush to decay or burn on depleted eroded hills, would be preferred to the common practice of concentrating excess sulfur salts and risking salinity by burying woody brush piles in low areas.
Or, Roads, Ditches and Headlands Hypotheses: Look from most roads, and it is clear that the road's existence has promoted salinity in adjacent fields.
Burying ancient topsoil within early road construction killed it, likely releasing its sulphate ions.
The deep living cloak of ancient deep prairie biology had also stabilized clay colloids holding adsorbed calcium and magnesium ions, and upon biology's death the ions became more mobile and moved by capillarity upwards to the road surface, to be wind blown or rain washed into ditches and fields. Ions below biology's original depth were also exposed and freed via cutting road and field drainage ditches.
Roads built of expanding clay swell like a sponge with distilled water from rain and snow, and then release ion-enriched solutions when compressed under each truck or train, drawing in the ditch water and then pumping it downwards and laterally via pressure wave through the spreading compaction under adjacent fields. Whereas pipelines recovered with vegetation and free of pulsating weight load, appear to not cause salinity.
The calcium-sulphate solution climbs upwards in fields by capillarity first wherever implement compaction has closed air pores and annual cropping has eliminated deep root soil drying perennials. Washboard vibration also settles soil in air pores, limiting aerobic root depth in adjacent fields.
Salinity first occurs within fields where implement weights are raised onto wheels and where the equal opposite forces for changing immense tractor momentums turning on headlands, for acceleration, and for shovels ripping soil upwards, are pushed downwards and laterally under the wheels, where tramlines are deliberately repeat compacted by heavy sprayers, where grain trucks punch down soil on headlands and approaches, and where old trails are compacted in pastures as evidenced by only foxtail-barley surviving.
Toxins such as benzene from asphalt, persistent lead from gasoline and cadmium from tires would also diminish soil life in adjacent fields. Greater tractor tire wear turning at headlands and field corners adds greater fungicidal cadmium there. Cadmium in phosphate fertilizers concentrates at headland overlaps.
If all valid, then salinity would be delayed by choosing the lightest tractors and implements, by replacing tractors with self-powered implements of even weight distribution on closely spaced wheels, by avoiding turning implements where salinity is risky adjacent to roads and sloughs, by reverting to round and round operations, by avoiding driving twice on the same trail, and possibly by replacing tires with steel tracks. Correlations between field salinity and road history, clay type, paving material, open shoulders, mowing, ditch vegetation, drainage, etc, would guide road design improvement. Roads of expanding clay might be covered to remain dry, and rebuilt of non-expanding mineral where ditches cannot drain, or restrict road usage to when dry or frozen. Weeping tile could be installed below ditch bottoms. Trains could be replaced with uniformly loaded conveyors for bulk or boxed products. Growing biomass energy in ditches and hay on headlands adjacent to roads could better capture opportunity by harvesting surplus sulfate and calcium ions. Establishing perennials in cut field drainage ditches would stabilize exposed subsoil and retain ions in the subsoil instead of release into waterways onto other farms.
Or, Sulfate Fertilizer Hypothesis: Sulfate anions (negatively charged ions) from ammonium-sulfate fertilizer, never fully utilized by crops, become leachable excess sulfate.
Ammonium-sulfate also reacts with the white calcium-carbonate in eroded knolls, yielding calcium-sulfate (Prasad + Power, Soil Fertility for Sustainable Agriculture, 1997).
If valid, then elemental sulfur might be preferred, as it requires active conversion by bacteria to leachable sulfate, which is more likely to occur where sulfate is deficient in the soil ecology.
Or, Ammonia Fertilizer Hypothesis: Ammonium cations (positively charged ions) from fertilizers displace calcium cations from the cation exchange surface of negatively-charged soil clay colloids (from Brady, The Nature and Properties of Soils, 1974). Once calcium is displaced and washed downwards with rain, it can never return to the dominant intricate arrangement within clay lattices it occupied for 10,000 years. Plants then replace the ammonium on the clay with hydrogen, so that spot is occupied preventing calcium's return. Soils depleted of calcium become aged soils, with altered physical properties, such as poor plasticity thus mucky when wet. The displaced calcium cations join the sulfate anions in solution, ultimately accumulating in deep gravel or lakes, or concentrating in surface puddles of calcium-sulfate salinity. Displacement from clay also occurs for magnesium to form magnesium-sulfate salinity. When wet soils are bare, such as fall-harrowed or tilled lands come early spring, water evaporation draws up water by capillarity, picking up the displaced calcium to concentrate it on the surface. Salinity would thus first appear where cationic fertilizer applications overlapped at headlands and over-dosed in field corners, as more free calcium has been displaced there by more added ammonium ions.
If valid, then dilute urea solutions or slow release urea, well mixed into the soil, instead of banded ammonia, might delay salinity occurrence. Or grow own nitrogen via companion cropped legumes every year, or add a legume green manure year, to fix nitrogen wherever deficient. Or, stabilize ionic fertilizers onto locally mined clay before addition to farmland, a plausible process to enable fertilization of low cation-exchange-capacity soils in Africa.
Or, Herbicide Residues Hypothesis: Some bio-degradable herbicides may concentrate and remain un-degraded in saline seeps due to high salts inhibiting microbial life, adding to difficulty establishing crops. Pesticide registrations likely do not test for biodegradation amongst saline salts, yet pesticides are typically applied to saline soils, possibly illegally.
If valid, then avoid pesticide use in saline areas.
Or, Glyphosate Hypothesis: Chelating of metal nutrients such as zinc, copper, iron, manganese by systemic glyphosate, (originally patented as a metal chelator), within the growing tip of a deep alfalfa or thistle root, and distant from topsoil bacteria which may have adapted to degrade glyphosate, may result in the perpetual unavailability of those essential metal nutrients at that location. That inhibits living decay there by fungi, its recycling of nutrients, and re-rooting of future crops in that poisoned spot. Upon tie-up of the trace metals essential in synthesizing the enzymes of life, other nutrients which had for 10,000 years been assembled by biology in nutritional balance at that location become surplus. Surplus sulfate would be released, and soil adhesiveness, air porosity and depth of accessible water be diminished due to absence of soil life.
If valid, then for canola, non-systemic glufosinate-ammonia tolerance would be preferred over systemic glyphosate tolerance. For quackgrass control, other grass herbicides such as sethoxydim, or chisel tillage of patches, would be preferred. Abrasive particles spray can be developed for pre-seeding, and optical row guidance tillage for narrow row weeding.
Or, Fungicides Hypothesis: Plant decay is a living process conducted by fungi to intimately transfer residual energy and component nutrients for reuse within a new organism. Fungicides prevent this transfer of nutrients into living fungi by killing fungi. Nutrients can be lost from reuse within the living ecology when fungicides cause dead disintegration instead of living decay. Phosphate and sulfate are then extracted like tea from sterile dead leaves, onto a fungicide-inhibited soil surface, to run-off or leach into saline seeps and lakes. Systemic fungicides may poison wheat roots' symbiotic fungal mycorhizae, weakening soil cohesion and releasing sulfate as the mycorhizae disintegrate.
If valid, then short-lived contact fungicides would be preferred to systemic fungicides.
Or, Distillers Dry Grains Hypothesis: Well water is added to corn to enable yeast to convert sugars into alcohol. Alcohol is first distilled, and then pure water boiled off. All salts from the well become concentrated in the DDG livestock feed, and thus in fields wherever the manure goes.
If valid, then distillers might internally recycle their water, to keep salts out of DDG.
Or, Slough Rings Hypothesis: Water held in sloughs/ponds wets laterally and about six feet upwards via capillarity into adjacent fields. Within the first few feet of the edge of sloughs, the typical good crop growth there suggests it gets annually flushed of any excess calcium-sulfate field salts via dissolving into the distilled snow melt water as it climbs up from the slough to the ring in the field where salts accumulate. (If sulfate had originated in slough water, there would instead be greater concentration of salts closer to the slough edge, not in the upslope ring, due to slough water continuing to wet only lower levels of the surrounding field as its level dries down over summer.) From the hill above, waters also carrying displaced calcium-sulfate would leach down slope through the subsoil until colliding at the slough water wetted boundary ring, concentrating its upland sulfate there at the ring as its pure water evaporates. A greater ring salt concentration correlating with a longer hill above the ring, would suggest those salts originated due to farming practices.
If valid, then planting hay as a salinity barrier in low areas will be ineffective in halting the excess calcium-sulfate originated in upland subsoil and slowly leaching for many years, but would reduce evaporation concentrating those salts at the surface because deep perennial roots continually draw water from depth allowing rainfall to permeate downwards.
The typical good crop growth adjacent to old slough edges might also owe to the 10,000 year old continuous subsoil life of its ancient deep sod. Ancient mycorhizae receiving energy from the perennial plants might extend under the field, symbiotically supporting our crop plants with nutrients and stimulants. Ancient porosity facilitating deep oxygen for roots might also endure.
If valid, then re-establish deep-rooted perennials such as sparse wild rose or alfalfa within our annual crops, perhaps one enduring plant every six feet, to retain nutrient life on hills.
Or, Over-Grazing Hypothesis: Daily leaf removal via grazing of pastures near to gates and barnyards reduces the daily photosynthesis energy available to fuel root life by using it instead for cattle, starving deep roots, leaving only shallow roots. The deep subsoil biology no longer receives energy from root exudates and dies, releasing its ancient sulfate.
If valid, then rotational grazing, or retaining some unpalatable, thorny or alternate use perennials in pastures to discourage daily grazing of all deep-rooted perennial species, such as endured in productive old Australian pastures (from Entz), would be preferred.
Or, Cattails and Algae Hypothesis: Depletion of nutrients from the subsoil of uplands, plus surplus fertilizer applications, may have nourished the expansion of tall lush dark green cattail displacing the original grasses in sloughs. Toxic blue-green N-fixing cyanobacteria might flourish in lakes due to receiving an influx of prior-limiting P, S, or Fe essential for its nitrogenase enzyme, due to salinity processes in annual cropped farmlands.
If valid, then harvesting cattails or pond water and adding to eroded knolls would re-establish nutrient uniformity, plus return the ecology of marshes back to favouring finer species for hay. Halting salinity processes would ultimately improve Lake Winnipeg.
Or, Salinity as Fertilizer Hypothesis: Colour variation in saline areas could identify various different nutrient concentrations. Where not a white salt, sulfur might be depleted.
If valid, then first simply harvest the visible white calcium-sulfate salts whenever dry on the surface, and spread back onto eroded knolls to re-establish nutrient uniformity. Old farmers with grain shovelling skill might thus earn redemption. Or use a light ATV to scrape up dry nutrients while avoiding wet subsoil compaction.
Flooding Hypothesis: Soils temporarily flooded, such as the bottoms of drains, typically grow taller plants than adjacent saline soils, due to salts dissolving then flowing off.
If valid, then back-flood saline flats to dissolve sulfate, for big gun or trickle irrigation onto knolls, or flush into a lined catchment, evaporate to concentrate and sell as sulfate fertilizer.
Drainage Hypothesis: Tile-draining fields, and draining sloughs into lakes, remove excess calcium-sulfate in low areas, but if the above hypotheses are valid, do not correct the agronomy errors that cause the continuous bleeding of scarce nutrients from the upland subsoil, limiting future rooting depth and diminishing sustainable food potential there.
Saline Forage Suggestion: After skimming off the visible salts, perhaps sow low-coumarin sweet clover, alfalfa, timothy, volunteer kochia, dandelion and quackgrass for hay or into silage to soften foxtail-barley awns. Wherever plants can't grow, immediately cover with straw or fabric, or till a loose soil mulch, to halt evaporation from barren hard soil and the salt concentration it drives.
Actions: Salinity ratings can be required for fertilizer and pesticide licensing. Compaction ratings can be required for turning and operating new farm implements.
Students of science can critique and imagine experiments to test hypotheses. Governments can fund independent research. Individual farmers, and their commodity associations, can correlate management histories with differing salinity on adjacent farms, discern lessons reading the landscape, and openly discuss, to advance agronomy wisdom to halt salinity.
By: Grant A. Rigby, B.Sc.Agronomy, M.Sc.Food, copyright, independently written.
First published: Manitoba Cooperator Nov 27, 2014. Updates: www.rigbyorchards.com
Added February 6, 2018
Calcium sulfate solubility: The sole error in the above hypotheses that has been communicated, is that "calcium-sulfate is not very soluble" and thus would not likely be migrating in solution down from the hills. But "low" solubility does not mean no solubility, and natural soils are not the same as homogeneous mixtures in stirred laboratory beakers. Certainly the mobility of sulfate in fields in well known. A soil solution into which native calcium cations have been displaced from the soil clays, by cationic ammonium fertilizer, would transport those calcium ions in single file via tiny capillary channels until encountering some unoccupied negative charge or negative ion to hold the positive calcium ions. Conveyance via capillary streams might empty into the wetted slough ring or the puddle at the slope bottom.
Manitoba Soil Society, on their tour into the trench dug on my farm in Aug 2012, observed white calcium-sulfate granules in the small patch of foxtail barley above the wet subsoil of very high electro-conductivity, consistent with calcium-sulfate being of low solubility. Other more soluble salts in salinity such as magnesium-sulfate might have remained dissolved. The soil scientists proposed that the sulfate anion had flowed to that location from uphill via the only seam of sand apparent, which was directly under the wet saline brine under the foxtail barley patch. The origin of the calcium cation was not considered. Maybe calcium had also flowed there via the sand seam. Or maybe the free calcium cation might have originated nearby after being displaced off the cation-exchange when ammonium ions had been added via ammonium-nitrate, ammonium phosphate, ammonium sulfate, anhydrous ammonia and possibly from urea fertilizer, applied from 1964 to 2001. If valid, then alternate forms of nitrogen addition could be considered, such as supplied in a non-ionic form already adsorbed to clay particles, or maybe urea would be less harsh, or maybe add legumes every year to grow as nitrogen-fixing companion crops.
Grandpa's summer-fallow hypothesis: Following writing this essay, I was made aware of an alternate hypothesis promoted by retired soil chemists. It is declared the primary and sole relevant cause of the soil salinity present today, in the lower regions of virtually every field on The Prairies that has had several decades of annual cropping, where there often was no salinity as recent as two decades ago, is the practice of summer-fallow that ended five decades ago. The argument is that during the years in which summer-fallow was practiced, such as every fourth year on our family homestead during the period from around WWI until 1964, maybe twelve times, insufficient living foliage was present to transpire rainfall such that the surplus water recharged the groundwater (which was an objective of summer fallow) but unfortunately the extra groundwater then moved laterally, picked up anions and cations presumed to be freely available in the subsoil, and emerged in lower discharge regions where these salts were concentrated when the water evaporated. There is some obvious plausible merit to the hypothesis, and visual evidence in some locations supports it. Some compacted roads appear to act as dams to these presumed mass flows across the landscape, with salts piling up on the upslope side, however salinity often also occurs near to roads on the down slope side where the hypothesis would suggest excess salts should be diminishing instead. It is further suggested that crop yields initially improved in the discharge areas in fields due to the additional salts, without acknowledging that wind, water and tillage erosion also deposited extra nutrient-rich topsoil in these same areas, before these low areas later becoming excessively saline.
However, the mere absence of green foliage does not explain why that same effect did not occur, at a perhaps slower pace, over the previous 120 centuries, whenever a herd of bison grazed the Prairie nude, or a hot prairie fire scorched it black, and a rainstorm occurred after that event, similar to the situation of a human summer-fallow in which there is no foliage at the moment of a heavy rainfall. Instead, the most notable difference between 136 years ago when there was no saline spots on our homestead, and 18 years ago when white surface salts first appeared, was the prior existence of native Prairie subsoil having living perennial roots a few meters deep and mycorhizae extending even deeper.
On our homestead, grandpa would have only had time to till summer-fallow just prior to weeds setting seed, and likely sometimes was caught too late back in the days of horses or small tractors with small plows, especially in the wetter years when weeds likely flourished following each rain before it dried enough for tillage, the same years which the chemists' hypothesis assumes no plants would have been present. Those decades also had living deep-rooted biennial sweet clover in rotation for hay or plow down. Like most farms in the eastern Prairies, we quit sweet clover and summer-fallow practices as soon as nitrogen fertilizer was available in 1964. Most grain farms of the modern era dependably achieve dead-fallow via tillage in the fall and in the spring, or now generally with in-crop glyphosate achieve termination of all plant life prior to September, ensuring two-three months of no-plant-life-dead-fallow every year prior to freeze-up and another two months every spring prior to a establishing a full ground cover of living foliage capable of transpiring excess rainfall. Typically only in July does an annual grain crop have one meter deep living roots to capture the water from a moderate rainfall before it percolates below the living roots.
To the extent the chemists' hypothesis may have validity, in that the absence of living plants allows for more of the surplus water from excess rainfall events to percolate from recharge to discharge zones, that situation continues today under glyphosate-farming practices, and it is perhaps a more pernicious state of annual dead-fallow than practiced during the one in four infrequently-tilled summer-fallow years of grandpa's era, which was also a generally lower rainfall period than recent decades.
We should consider the possibility of conflicting vested bias behind the promotion of the blame-grandpa's-summer-fallow hypothesis as the sole explanation. Bias could originate from desire to maintain prestige for past leadership of soil science during the period in which salinity appeared on every grain farm on The Prairies under its watch. Or bias could originate from paid speaking to audiences funded by the sale of ionic soil additives, tramline soil compacting equipment, annual monoculture crop systems, etc, some of which are possibly causative of salinity if any of the other above hypotheses have merit. Only two solutions get presented, one being to abandon grain cropping on all recharge and discharge areas of fields and plant to perennial low value hay, or to destroy the ancient capillary channels and mycorhizae of the subsoil when installing likely soon to be obsolete, simplistic large petroleum-plastic tubes as crude tile drainage, that might harbor root pathogens and herbivores, and may plug with dead eels in stagnant sewer within a half century, requiring soil destructive removal then.
Instead of hiring crude plastic tile drainage, we might consider first scraping off the nutrient-rich top few inches of saline patches, perhaps after a dry period in spring when the salts are concentrated on top, and stockpile it. Then seed barley and leave a loose soil crumble for mulch to prevent evaporation drawing up more subsoil salts. In fall, spread the stockpile as sulfur-rich fertilizer back on the eroded knolls from which it may have originated. First test this treatment by skimming the salts with a scoop shovel and spread out on larger areas on a knoll, cognizant that there might be short-term high concentrations of undegraded herbicides among the sulfate salts, then record the treatment spots via GPS coordinates, and observe plant growth.
By: Grant A. Rigby, B.Sc.Agronomy, M.Sc.Food, copyright, independently written.
First published: Manitoba Cooperator Nov 27, 2014. Updates: www.rigbyorchards.com
Added September 30, 2020
Explaining salinity may not require us to imagine long distance deep subsoil flow of surplus rain water from higher grounds, originating back when our grandpas did summer fallow, then resurfacing in lowland seeps decades later, as its primary cause. The grandpa's upland summer fallow hypothesis is difficult to imagine as plausible in essentially flat regions such as the Elgin-Dunrea plain and Rathwell-StClaude plain where salinity now appears where non-existent a couple of decades ago.
Driving from Morden to Edmonton, the occurrence of salinity patches in recent years on every field which has likely been grain farmed using standard recommended practices in recent decades, challenges the grandpa summer fallow hypothesis because it is not likely that every field would have had that treatment in its history, as some were likely in pasture during the summer fallow era. Indeed salinity occurs now in wetter eastern regions where summer fallow was not routine in the past. This suggests that the causes of salinity are instead possibly within the practices of recent decades that have been recommended to farmers by P.Ag. Agronomists under the Profession of Agrology.
The Ammonium Fertilizer and Sulfate Fertilizer Hypotheses could provide a simple valid explanation for the increase in salinity salts at lower slopes and bottom lands. Via mere surface water flow, whenever rate of rainfall exceeds the percolation rate, the run-off rain water dissolves the fertilizer ammonium-exchanged calcium ions permanently flushed out of montmorillonite clay via "cation exchange", and also picks up fertilizer sulfate ions, and then carries these ions down slope to puddle and concentrate there as calcium-sulfate salinity.
In Agricultural Sciences, we were taught in the late 1970's that the way to understand dirt was to take a core sample, dry it, pulverize it, suspend in solution with pure chemicals and measure concepts such as "cation-exchange capacity". The goal was to optimize use of the clays in dirt for holding (adsorbing) and releasing (desorbing) ionic fertilizer. If one was to use the same approach to understanding a forest, one would take a core sample of the forest capturing some branches, monkey legs, termites and mushrooms, then dry it, pulverize it, suspend in solution with chemicals and measure its "cation-exchange capacity" with the goal of determining how much anhydrous ammonia gas it could adsorb and then recommend that to the forest farmer. Soil biology was irrelevant, and possible consequences of long term additions of pure ions not contemplated. For a half century, farmers have been advised to add concentrated pure ionic ammonium, altering the montmorillonite clays in our soils via permanent displacement of ancient adsorbed calcium, magnesium, potassium cations etc., to achieve temporary adsorption of ammonium cations.
The fertilizer hypotheses correlates with my perception that farms which have been more aggressively ammonium cation fertilized, for longer periods, tend to exhibit more salinity, unless totally drained away or if the subsoil is porous to allow continuous leaching away of fertilizer-created calcium salts. Lands we have farmed now for a quarter century, adjacent to our 1882 homestead, having the same general agronomic history except during the 1980's when that land received anhydrous ammonia whereas ours received granular urea, shows greater enduring salinity than on our homestead, evidenced now by stunted plant growth and enduring white salt granules in the affected areas, although we have succeeded since 2001 in getting hay-worthy vegetation growing on all its formerly low bare patches.
An old friend, farm kid who continued part-time farming, but educated as rational electrician instead of indoctrinated in agchem agronomy, commented following my suggesting the hypothesis that ammonium fertilizer might have caused salinity, "Oh we all know that! It first appeared after they started applying anhydrous ammonia."
The ag-chem supply industry has in the last two decades added its promotion of subsurface tile drainage installation to remove salts. This suggests industry awareness that increased drainage might be needed to facilitate continuance of ionic fertilizer sales for annual cropping, via enabling the flushing via wasted rainfall, of the calcium magnesium potassium cations exchanged out of montmorillonite clay, plus the excess sulfate additions, being fertilizer-created salt bines, out of sight off to downstream farm plains and into Lake Winnipeg.
In recent years the fertilizer industry launched its "4R's" promotional campaign, of which one of the R's is for "Right Product", and the options include concentrated ionic salts of plant nutrients. If the above hypothesis, that ionic ammonium could cause salinity, is valid, then anhydrous ammonia can never be the "right" product, yet provincial governments endorse the fertilizer industry's "4R's" promotion of all concentrated ionic fertilizers.
The Hypothesis that Glyphosate might increase salinity may be supported by recent science-published research by Muola et al., 2020, who observed glyphosate activity from glyphosate-containing feed enduring though poultry into poultry manure stunting crop growth: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969720349512 (or https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141422) This implies that glyphosate sprayed onto plants and soils in areas in areas developing salinity might not be immediately inactivated upon soil contact as farmers were repeatedly assured of for five decades, but rather that glyphosate retains soil herbicidal activity and inhibits our attempts to halt salination by establishing crops there. The adoption of glyphosate as a general annual weed control technology coincides with the general increase of salination where it was historically absent. The squaring of fields via herbicide application dictated by GPS, with the objective of annual cropping of all land surfaces, resulted in routine glyphosate application through low areas which were prone to salinity and now have too high of a salt concentration to grow crops, suggesting a possible causative relationship.
The Ditches Hypothesis might explain the occurrence of salinity in low areas which have received drainage waters which have flowed through cut ditches. The biological cloak of the original prairie may have held calcium ions in situ since the ice age, until that cloak was removed/killed via ditch excavation. Thus any low area contiguous with a cut ditch might have received and continues to receive salts from the exposed dead subsoil in both old road ditches and newer farm drainage ditches. Wide flat bottomed highway ditches, especially if not recovered with living vegetation and intact solid mulch shading, would provide more exposed surface area for sun's evaporation of water drawing up more water drawing up more water via capillarity from subsoil, carrying salt ions released due to the removal of biology. Wind from traffic accelerates the rate of evaporation and the concentration of ions at the surface, and also lifts some salts via dust out into fields. For several decades, most highways ditches were mowed and herbicide treated with the goal of monoculture lawns, but failed to re-establish a living cloak of sod. If valid, then covering road ditch bottoms to prevent salt wicking water evaporation from exposed subsoil, and requiring drainage ditches on farms to be recovered with living sod to prevent release of ions from dead subsoil, would help.
The Compacted Pasture Roads Hypothesis is clearly valid. Wherever vehicles are repeatedly driven on the same wheel paths, the wheel paths become void of vegetation, white salts concentrate on the surface brought up by evaporation-driven capillarity, and foxtail barley becomes the only species able to live adjacent to the compacted trails. Over time the salinity expands beyond merely adjacent to the wheel tracks. AgChem industry's promotion of establishing permanent tram lines for wheel tracks of implements such as high clearance sprayers seems to irresponsibly ignore the observed impact of compacted trails on salinity creation.
On-Farm Experiment: Skim a grain scoop shovelful of white salted soil from a low saline patch, and spread it out over e.g. 25x the area on one side of an eroded knoll. Observe effect on crop growth, cognizant there might be some residual herbicides as well as nutrients such as sulfate.
Written 2014, 2016, 2018, 2020
By: Grant A. Rigby, B.Sc.Agronomy, M.Sc.Food, copyright, independently written.
First published: Manitoba Cooperator Nov 27, 2014. Updates: www.rigbyorchards.com
"RESPONSIBLE GRAIN" CODE OF PRACTICE - draft amendments - Feb 27, 2021
Sent to: Manitoba Crop Alliance, Manitoba Pulse Soybean Growers, Manitoba Canola Council, Atlantic Grains Council, Grain Growers of Quebec, Grain Farmers of Ontario, Alberta Wheat Barley Commission, Saskatchewan Wheat Dev Commission, BC Grain Producers, Canada Grains Council, Saskatchewan Pulse Growers, Alberta Pulse Growers, Pulse Canada, Alberta Canola Growers, Saskatchewan Mustard Dev Commission, Saskatchewan Canola Growers, Ontario Canola Growers, Canola Council of Canada, Soil Conservation Council of Canada.
SOIL MANAGEMENT MODULE - entirely rewrite to clearly state only the critical objectives:
1. Soil Carbon Erosion Prevention:
- Prevent risk of loss of soil by wind erosion, especially via avoiding leaving fine soil particles on the surface without mulch or stubble or clog protection, vulnerable to being lifted and its carbon oxidized by winds.
- Minimize soil movement down slope due to tillage and water erosion, and prevent soil loss from within arable fields such that erosion soil is retained and recoverable for redistribution back onto eroded areas in the future.
2. Soil Contamination Prevention:
Avoid polluting soil with non-biodegradable persistent toxins, nor with materials limiting future farming practices.
3. Soil Salinity Prevention:
Prevent further salination processes wherever salinity salts are of a concentration suppressing growth of any crop.
4. Soil Compaction Prevention:
Select operations minimizing loss of porosity in the subsoil.
5. Soil Resource Preservation:
Wherever lands are converted from growing plants to other purposes, plan to minimize the area lost from farming , remove top soil exceeding 0.5% organic matter and within a decade redistribute to other sites, for example onto eroded knolls, to regain living roots in it and to improve plant growth there.
How each farmer achieves these five critical goals will vary and evolve with science and practicality.
WATER MANAGEMENT MODULE: - amendment:
2. Minimize risk of pollution of rivers and lakes, for example via perennial vegetative buffer zones beside non-arable creeks and municipal drains.
Grant Rigby M.Sc.Food, B.Sc.Agronomy
Homestead farmer www.grantrigby.ca Upper Pembina, SW Man, Earth.
Added April 27, 2021
Packer wheels directly over each seed row became standard on new seeding drills in the 1960's. Prior to then, the soil surface being left loose above the seed via harrowing after seeding, but that was vulnerable to wind erosion. During the 1980's, seeding with cultivators using air conveyance of the seed to under the shovels, and then covering the seed via mounted harrows, evolved to following with harrow-packing with heavy coil packers. I recall an engineer with Morris promoting their coil-pack-first-then-harrow machine, saying that leaving the field surface with a loose cloggy surface conserved moisture, instead of having rows of packed soil exposed to the air, as visibly evident at night when one can see moisture wicking to the surface for evaporation from the rows of packed soil but not from the loose dry soil between packed rows.
During the 1990's, we sowed with a 9 inch spacing cultivator air seeder on which I rearranged the mounted harrows, cutting off half of each double tyne to allow wet straw to flow through, and positioned the last rows of single tynes directly over each seed row, achieving an unpacked loose cloggy surface yet with straw and clogs cleared from above each seed row. But since then I have reverted to simpler old style gravity seeder boxes on double disk and hoe drills with packer wheels directly over the seed row. And all other farms now use more elaborate air distribution seeders, but with a similar end result of seed placed in rows followed by a packer wheel directly over each seed row.
This change from the pre-1960's practice of loose soil finish after seeding (until a half inch rain packs the soil), to a firm packed soil surface over each seed row, has coincided with increased salination. Wicking of subsoil moisture to the surface occurs at each packed seed row and each trailing seed tank wheel track. Evaporation into air removes the surface water molecules, tugging on the continuous capillary of water down maybe six feet to continuously replace the surface water lost to evaporation, concentrating solutes present in the subsoil up at the surface continuously for a few weeks every spring until full crop canopy and deep root growth allows for net water draw from depth versus evaporation from the surface. Wherever in the fields this concentration of calcium and magnesium and sodium cations, with chlorine and sulfate anions, becomes surface salts reducing crop yield, we can conclude the current seeding technology with packer wheel finish has been a major salination error.
Advertisement placed in southwest Manitoba newspapers "Recorder" "Guide" "Gazette":
Grandpa could spot harrow
wet saline spots after seeding, to
cover moist packer wheel tracks
with loose soil crumble mulch,
to halt evaporative wicking
of Calcium cations and
Sulfate anions concentrating
as famine's white saline salt.